| | | Date: Jan 16, 2019 | | Source: The Daily Star |  |  |  |
| | Three U.N. envoys who tried and failed in quest for Syria peace | Agence France Presse
BEIRUT: New U.N. envoy Geir Pedersen, who arrived in Damascus Tuesday on his first visit since taking up post, is the fourth head of U.N. efforts to end Syria’s nearly 8-year-old civil war.
The United Nations’ three previous special envoys all quit as their peace bids stalled. Pedersen, a seasoned Norwegian diplomat, took over on Jan. 7 from Staffan de Mistura, who followed veteran Algerian diplomat Lakhdar Brahimi and former U.N. chief Kofi Annan.
Here is a recap of their efforts in the face of a conflict that has killed hundreds of thousands of people and displaced millions since 2011.
Annan: did his ‘best’The late Kofi Annan, U.N. secretary-general from 1997 to 2006, was on Feb. 23, 2012, named to represent both the U.N. and the Arab League in efforts aimed at ending “violence and human rights violations, and promoting a peaceful solution to the Syrian crisis.”
He visited Damascus several times to meet President Bashar Assad and offered the warring sides a peace plan that was supposed to start with a cease-fire and envisaged a political transition.
But just six months later, on Aug. 2, Annan resigned, saying he had given it his “best” and complaining of a lack of support from major powers, implicitly referring to Russian and Chinese vetoes.
“You have to understand, as an envoy, I can’t want peace more than the protagonists, more than the Security Council or the international community for that matter,” he said.
Brahimi: ‘sad’ to leaveLakhdar Brahimi, a former Algerian foreign minister and one of the world’s most respected peace envoys, was named to take over on Aug. 17, 2012.
The following month he met Assad in Damascus, warning that the worsening conflict “is a threat to the Syrian people, the region and the world.”
He urged “all parties to unite their efforts to find a solution,” adding that the Syrian government needed to assume greater responsibility for a cessation of hostilities.
Brahimi organized in January and February 2014 the first face-to-face negotiations between the government and the opposition in Geneva, under the leadership of the United States and Russia.
However, he came up against the regime’s refusal to discuss the future of Assad and on May 13, after less than two years in the job, he too quit.
Brahimi said that he was “very sad ... [to] leave Syria behind in such a bad state.”
Damascus welcomed the resignation, having accused Brahimi of bias and interference in its internal affairs after he criticized its planned June 2014 presidential election as a blow to peace efforts.
De Mistura: ‘sorry’On July 10, 2014, veteran Italian-Swedish diplomat Staffan de Mistura took on the role, going on to organize nine rounds of indirect negotiations, in Geneva and Vienna, which came to nothing.
In December 2017, de Mistura called the penultimate round of talks a “golden opportunity missed” and accused the Syrian government of not seeking true dialogue with the opposition.
On Oct. 17, 2018, he announced he would step down, citing “purely personal reasons,” but with no breakthrough in sight.
He spent his last months in post pushing a U.N. plan to establish a committee to write a new constitution for Syria, envisaged to provide a basis for ending the war.
But in December 2018 he acknowledged the body would not be in place by year’s end, as had been hoped.
“I deeply regret what has not been achieved, and I am sorry more was not possible,” he said, noting there were issues with a list of participants that had been proposed by the government.
An op-ed in Syria’s pro-government Al-Watan newspaper underscored his tense relationship with Assad’s regime. “In Damascus, we will never be sorry for Staffan de Mistura’s departure,” it said. |
| | |
|
