THU 16 - 7 - 2020
Date: Jul 23, 2016
Source: The Daily Star
South Sudan: On a familiar road to war?
Ashish Kumar Sen

The international community needs to take a more active role in defusing the crisis in South Sudan where gunbattles between forces loyal to the president and vice president resulted in the death of 200 people, the Atlantic Council’s J. Peter Pham said. Contending that South Sudan’s president, Salva Kiir, and his vice president, Riek Machar, have been forced into a “shotgun marriage” as a result of an agreement on a unity government, Pham, who is director of the Atlantic Council’s Africa Center, said it is unreasonable to expect to successfully impose reconciliation upon warring factions that are not ready for it.

“One has to look at why it is that they are not ready,” Pham said. “Part of the answer is a failure of leadership among the South Sudanese themselves. ... As long as we rely on actors whose own interests are not aligned with those of their people or the international community there are always going to be these hiccups.”

In August of 2015, Kiir and Machar agreed to end the conflict that erupted in December of 2013 when Kiir accused Machar of plotting to overthrow him. U.S. officials found no evidence of a coup plot and a team of African Union investigators, led by former Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo, similarly found no such evidence.

After more than two decades of war that left around 2 million dead, South Sudan gained independence from Sudan in 2011. The violence in Juba over the weekend raised the specter of a replay of 2013 and the possibility of South Sudan slipping back into an all-out war.

Under the terms of a peace deal reached last summer, Kiir reappointed Machar as his vice president in a transitional unity government. But the unity government has been hamstrung from the start by deep-seated political rivalries between Machar and Kiir.

Machar delayed his return to Juba, South Sudan’s capital, to take up his duties amid accusations that he was being obstructed by Kiir. The Kiir government accused Machar of trying to bring with him “an arsenal of arms, inter alia, anti-tanks, laser guided missiles and heavy machine guns.” Given this history it was only a matter of time before a clash between the two sides – much like the kind that took place in Juba this past week.

“For the moment, things are contained,” Pham said. “Fighting can continue in Juba where both sides have a limited number of forces concentrated in very close quarters, but at this point because of the weather it is very difficult for either side to move large numbers of forces to a definitive battle. The real question is what happens in a few months when the rains cease and the countryside becomes passable again and forces can begin to move?”

Ashish Kumar Sen is deputy director, editorial, at the Atlantic Council. You can follow him on Twitter @AshishSen. This commentary is published by permission from the Atlantic Council and can be accessed at:
A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Daily Star on July 18, 2016, on page 7.

The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the Arab Network for the Study of Democracy
Readers Comments (0)
Add your comment

Enter the security code below*

 Can't read this? Try Another.
Related News
Sudan reshuffles government in bid to appease protests
Sudan says over 120 arrested before going to fight in Libya
Sudan moves against Bashir loyalists after assassination attempt
ICC trial in The Hague one option for Sudan's Bashir: minister
Sudan to hand over al-Bashir for genocide trial
Related Articles
An appeal to the world for Sudan’s future
Sudan’s chance for democracy
Moscow’s hand in Sudan’s future
The Fight to Save Sudan from the Counterrevolution
As Sudan uprising grew, Arab states worked to shape its fate
Copyright 2020 . All rights reserved