FRI 23 - 3 - 2018
Date: Jun 30, 2012
Author: Ziad Majed
Source: ziadmajed.blogspot
Some leftists and Syria

Notwithstanding over 15,000 dead, tens of thousands of testimonials, text and visual evidence of  the carnage inflicted by the Syrian regime on citizens denied their political freedoms by one father, his son and their next of kin, some Arab and Lebanese "recalcitrant" leftists have yet to cease and desist from defending  the Damascus regime.


Having dwelled at first on “imperialist” schemes  and conspiracies targeting the "recalcitrance" (Moumana'a),  countered concern over the Syrian question with one over Saudi Arabia's, opposed the horrors of Damascus prisons to Guantanamo, and compared  republican dynasty to monarchy,  they moved on to apprehensions about Islamists and Salafists, building on the widely anticipated outcome of Tunisian and Egyptian elections to project a similar path for Syria.

Not to pick on the over-simplistic world affairs' perspective of such leftists, or deconstruct  the justifications they built  on lurid analogies and their reflection on their character, and not to remind  them of the evident distinction between the devolution of power inherent  to republican systems and it's counterpart in a monarchy (be it democratic or otherwise), it helps to review  the three paradoxes that underpin  their assertions.

The first paradox -the ethical factor- exposes their implicit acknowledgement of the Syrian regime's barbarity, and the invocation of allegedly similar conduct to justify it.  In this fashion, deploring the killing of Syrian children becomes uncalled for, as long as other children perish in Ghaza, Iraq or Afghanistan.   The campaign for the release of someone like Mazen Darwish, journalist and legal activist, is likewise denounced on the grounds that political prisoners are held by Israel too, as if one campaign negated the other.  Thus, so called leftists wander away from the realm of politics and lose their moral compass, as they fail to respect human freedom and dignity in all places and instances.



The second paradox -the cultural factor- holds democracy, freedom and human rights as suspect and without merit, tainted as they are by their "western" nature and their association with the "colonial" west (pursuing  nefarious interests). It comes therefore as no surprise that these leftists look up to regimes such as the Chinese, North Korean, Russian, Iranian and Sudanese ones, since they all share a deep-seated contempt for "liberal" values,  while these regimes either renounced  the socialist economic model  (China and Russia), disparaged it since their inception (Iran and Sudan), or would not fit any ideology known to mankind (north Korea.)

The third paradox,-the psychological one- or rather a subliminally sectarian one- lies mainly in Sunni-phobia, directed against a perceived threat from the majority group.  It is disingenuously expressed as apprehension of salafism and obscurantism, at a time where "recalcitrant" leftists exhibit no such apprehensions towards the overbearing Iranian Islamic Republic.  They fail to convince too, when claiming that support for Tehran is confined to it's hostility towards the US and Israel, when one recalls that Jihadi Sunni Salafism fought the US in Iraq far more vigorously in the span of a few years than did Iran and its allies over decades.  Last but not least, Iran's ally in Lebanon, Hizbollah, is by no means less fundamentalist than the shades of Muslim brotherhood they revile.  It is therefore all too clear that Leftists' motives have little to do with "secularism" and "resistance" and draw mostly on sectarian minority impulses.

The preceding  paradoxes demonstrate that duplicity and sectarianism are the defining characteristics of many leftist defenders of Assad's dictatorship and its cruelty.  An aversion towards freedoms and addiction to totalitarianism define their approach to events and makes for common grounds between them and certain religious movements and tyrannical regimes. 

So-called leftists have hence scored a dark and ignominious record, siding with murderers  against victims engaged in a courageous struggle for freedom and just societies.

The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the Arab Network for the Study of Democracy
Readers Comments (0)
Add your comment

Enter the security code below*

 Can't read this? Try Another.
Articles for the same author
Une nouvelle «question d’Orient»?
Face au silence des intellectuels, il faut rompre la solitude du peuple syrien
The Apathy of a Hodgepodge of many Leftists & Arab Nationalists
Combats à Damas : "La forteresse sécuritaire du régime est secouée"
"El-Assad contrôle toujours Damas, mais ne s'y sent plus en sécurité"
Related News
Strike near school in Syria's Idlib kills 16 children
Syria rebels say deal struck to evacuate Ghouta town
Nuclear targets: Middle East attacks linked to Israel
Israel: 2007 bombing of Syrian nuclear reactor a lesson for Iran
62 regime fighters dead in Daesh attack on Syria capital: Observatory
Related Articles
The Turks have taken Afrin. Let’s not let Manbij fall next
The commune system: PYD governance in northeastern Syria
Syria at seven: Is a pathway to diplomacy possible?
In war-torn Syria, the messenger shoots you
U.S., allies risk squandering chance to redirect Syria
Editor In Chief & Webmaster : Nazih Darwish
Copyright 2018 . All rights reserved