FRI 18 - 10 - 2024
 
Date: Dec 10, 2011
Author: AbdelAziz Karraky
Source: Zawaya Magharebia
The International Criminal Court should be involved in trying Saif al-Islam
Libya is going through a transition phase with a political regime and future ruling institutions that lack clarity. The way the Libyan Colonel was killed and his dead body abused, proves that society is dominated by revenge. The situation is further worsened with the spread of all types of weapons among citizens, the re-emergence of the tribal structure as a determinant of belonging, and – above all – the detention of Saif al-Islam Kadhafi. The rebels probably realized that they rushed to kill Moamer Kadhafi, and that it was a mistake to show the world the horrible pictures of his murder, so they decided to put Saif al-Islam on trial.
 
However, the question that arises today is: Can Libya ensure a fair trial for the Colonel’s son?
 
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that “everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.” The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights defines the conditions of a fair trial, but I don’t think that a country emerging from a crisis like Libya can satisfy such conditions, as the desire for revenge will eventually prevail. History has confirmed more than once that the victor’s justice triumphs over everything else in such cases.
 
Kadhafi had committed unprecedented atrocities against his people and many other nations. By the end of Kadhafi’s rule, his son emerged. Many people thought that the son wouldn’t exactly be like his father, but he proved them wrong. However, that is not an excuse to turn justice into a reprisal machine.
 
According to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, “all persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals. In the determination of any criminal charge against him, or of his rights and obligations in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law…” Not to mention the guarantee to examine witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf, and the right to his conviction and sentence being reviewed by a higher tribunal according to law.
 
Will the Libyan judiciary accept to do that?
 
A fair trial of Saif al-Islam would be highly beneficial if held under the auspices of the International Criminal Court, which is capable of discussing the facts objectively, and enabling the accused to enjoy all his rights as a human being. Libya did not overthrow Kadhafi on its own; many countries contributed to that, and they perfectly realize that Libya is in dire need for rehabilitating its human resources.

The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the Arab Network for the Study of Democracy
 
Readers Comments (0)
Add your comment

Enter the security code below*

 Can't read this? Try Another.
 
Articles for the same author
Democracy is to ensure resolution of all these problems and I think that people in this region are aware of this
Mali coup strengthens rogue groups
The 09/11 terrorist attack, a shock to the entire world
Maghreb societies need to move towards separation of powers
Strengthening the judiciary: a must for democracy
Related News
Down but not out, Haftar still looms over Libya peace process
Turkey's Erdogan meets with head of Libya's UN-recognized govt
Media watchdog urges Libyan gov't to release reporter
Key Libyan interior minister suspended amid protests
Russia and Turkey agree to push for Libya ceasefire, says Moscow
Related Articles
Divisions over Libya are now spreading across the Mediterranean
Erdogan wades into Libya quagmire
It’s time to tackle inequality from the middle
Haftar’s rebranded Libya coups
Russia’s mediation goals in Libya
Copyright 2024 . All rights reserved